Discussion
关于纵向条件百分位图的讨论意见AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:材料明确讨论分位数回归及纵向条件百分位图,直接对应分位数与分布方法。
关于纵向条件百分位图的讨论意见AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
I will use the terms "reference centiles" or "centile charts," as the setting that I consider here is more general than that of "growth charts."Longitudinal reference centiles over some measure of time (typically age) are almost always implemented repeatedly on the same individual.In this kind of setting the notion of conditional or adaptive centile charts is very appealing, particularly when the within-individual variability is much less than that between individuals.While marginal or unconditional centile charts are common in many areas of application, conditional charts are still rarely encountered and further methodological development in this area is to be welcomed.The flexibility of the quantile regression approach of Wei and He (WH), for instance in allowing the dependence on past history to vary across centiles, is most attractive, as are the rigor and scope of their consideration of the problem.I do, nevertheless, want to make a few cautionary remarks.The first relates to regression quantiles in particular, the second concerns a constraint common to all existing methods of constructing conditional percentiles, and the third and final point addresses the use of centile charts for screening.To concretize the discussion, the following setting will be considered throughout: the measurement of interest is assumed to be diastolic blood pressure in pregnant women, monitored between weeks 16 and 36 of pregnancy.There is typically an initial dip in blood pressure over this period, followed by a rise toward the end of pregnancy.