跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究敏感行为调查中的随机化回答与比例回归,未说明经济选择行为或其他所列细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
N. J. Scheers
C. Mitchell Dayton

引入协变量的随机化回答模型

研究问题
如何在保护敏感行为调查回答的同时,利用协变量降低随机化回答估计的标准误,并描述敏感特征比例的变化?
方法与思路
作者假定协变量分布已知,用两参数 logistic 函数描述敏感特征比例与协变量的关系,并扩展不同随机化回答方案。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称协变量扩展可提高相对效率,并以构造数据及学生作弊调查说明应用;同时指出关系误设可能造成较大偏差。
阅读关注点
应核对协变量分布已知的依据、随机化机制与估计过程,并检查函数形式诊断及标准误降低所对应的比较条件。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;示例中的拟合表现不能保证其他调查的有效性,误设偏差仍需评估。

原文摘要

The randomized response technique (RRT) is a survey procedure that requires respondents to decide randomly whether to respond to a sensitive question in its positive or negative form (Warner 1965) or respond to a sensitive question and an unrelated question (Greenberg, Abul-Ela, Simmons, and Horvitz 1969). Although RRT results in larger standard errors than direct questioning or anonymous questionnaires, there is empirical evidence that RRT results in less underreporting of sensitive behavior, so estimates tend to be biased to a lesser degree than when alternate techniques are used. This article develops and illustrates the application of a covariate extension of RRT that can reduce standard errors and that allows for modeling the relation between the proportion with a sensitive characteristic and a covariate. It is assumed that the covariate, X, has a known distribution. Then, the covariate RRT involves selecting a functional form for the relation between π A , the proportion with the sensitive characteristic, and X: πA|X = g(X | α), where α is a vector of parameters that generally must be estimated from the data. Because of its mathematical tractability, the two-parameter logistic function g(X | α) = [1 + exp(– α1 – α2 · X)]–1 was developed for the Warner RRT and both the πv -known and πy -unknown versions of the unrelated-question RRT. A small-scale study using contrived but realistic data situations demonstrated the relative efficiency of the covariate RRT compared with the ordinary RRT at each level of a stratified covariate. It should be noted, however, that misspecification of the relation between πA and X may result in a substantial bias component, so it is important to assess the appropriateness of a model for a particular data set. The covariate RRT was applied to data for five questions from a cheating study involving 184 university students. The covariate was estimated grade point average (GPA). The logistic function provided acceptable fit for all five questions, although the parameter estimates associated with GPA were statistically significant for only three of the five questions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文