Covariate Randomized Response Models
引入协变量的随机化回答模型AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究敏感行为调查中的随机化回答与比例回归,未说明经济选择行为或其他所列细分方向。
反馈分类问题引入协变量的随机化回答模型AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The randomized response technique (RRT) is a survey procedure that requires respondents to decide randomly whether to respond to a sensitive question in its positive or negative form (Warner 1965) or respond to a sensitive question and an unrelated question (Greenberg, Abul-Ela, Simmons, and Horvitz 1969). Although RRT results in larger standard errors than direct questioning or anonymous questionnaires, there is empirical evidence that RRT results in less underreporting of sensitive behavior, so estimates tend to be biased to a lesser degree than when alternate techniques are used. This article develops and illustrates the application of a covariate extension of RRT that can reduce standard errors and that allows for modeling the relation between the proportion with a sensitive characteristic and a covariate. It is assumed that the covariate, X, has a known distribution. Then, the covariate RRT involves selecting a functional form for the relation between π A , the proportion with the sensitive characteristic, and X: πA|X = g(X | α), where α is a vector of parameters that generally must be estimated from the data. Because of its mathematical tractability, the two-parameter logistic function g(X | α) = [1 + exp(– α1 – α2 · X)]–1 was developed for the Warner RRT and both the πv -known and πy -unknown versions of the unrelated-question RRT. A small-scale study using contrived but realistic data situations demonstrated the relative efficiency of the covariate RRT compared with the ordinary RRT at each level of a stratified covariate. It should be noted, however, that misspecification of the relation between πA and X may result in a substantial bias component, so it is important to assess the appropriateness of a model for a particular data set. The covariate RRT was applied to data for five questions from a cheating study involving 184 university students. The covariate was estimated grade point average (GPA). The logistic function provided acceptable fit for all five questions, although the parameter estimates associated with GPA were statistically significant for only three of the five questions.