跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:研究对象是数量遗传学与空间过程,摘要没有经济面板、网络或金融因子分析的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Sudipto Banerjee
Andrew O. Finley
Patrik Waldmann
Tore Ericsson

大型多性状遗传试验的分层空间过程模型

研究问题
研究如何在大型空间定位的多性状遗传试验中推断加性与显性遗传方差,同时处理空间残差和多变量模型的计算负担。
方法与思路
作者建立贝叶斯分层空间模型,以亲缘关系矩阵的谱分解减少求逆,并用指定结点上的多变量预测过程降低空间计算维度。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称这些方法支持大型遗传试验的综合分析;合成数据和松树试验应用显示,忽略空间效应可能低估遗传力。
阅读关注点
应核对遗传效应与空间效应如何区分、结点选择带来的近似误差,以及遗传力偏差结论对应的数据设置和后验诊断。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;无法判断近似精度、参数可识别性或偏差结论的普遍性,亦不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

This article expands upon recent interest in Bayesian hierarchical models in quantitative genetics by developing spatial process models for inference on additive and dominance genetic variance within the context of large spatially referenced trial datasets of multiple traits of interest. Direct application of such multivariate models to large spatial datasets is often computationally infeasible because of cubic order matrix algorithms involved in estimation. The situation is even worse in Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) contexts where such computations are performed for several thousand iterations. Here, we discuss approaches that help obviate these hurdles without sacrificing the richness in modeling. For genetic effects, we demonstrate how an initial spectral decomposition of the relationship matrices negates the expensive matrix inversions required in previously proposed MCMC methods. For spatial effects we discuss a multivariate predictive process that reduces the computational burden by projecting the original process onto a subspace generated by realizations of the original process at a specified set of locations (or knots). We illustrate the proposed methods using a synthetic dataset with multivariate additive and dominant genetic effects and anisotropic spatial residuals, and a large dataset from a scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) progeny study conducted in northern Sweden. Our approaches enable us to provide a comprehensive analysis of this large trial which amply demonstrates that, in addition to violating basic assumptions of the linear model, ignoring spatial effects can result in downwardly biased measures of heritability.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文