On assessing the strength of dependency between failure time variates
失效时间变量间依赖强度的评估AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究二元失效时间的依赖度量与删失推断,未涉及经济网络干扰或所列具体金融风险对象。
失效时间变量间依赖强度的评估AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The correlation p between cumulative hazard variates is considered as a measure of dependence between pairs of failure time variates. Such correlation is readily estimated in the absence of censorship, but modelling assumptions are required for its estimation in the presence of independent right censorship. A semiparametric class of bivariate failure time models, in which a dependence parameter is in one-to-one correspondence with the cumulative hazard variate correlation p, is considered for this purpose. A simple estimating function, consisting of a weighted sum over the grid formed by the observed failure times of differences between nonparametric and model-restricted estimates of covariance rates, is proposed for estimation and corresponding asymptotic distribution theory is given. This estimation procedure is shown to lack robustness under conditions of moderate to heavy censorship, motivating consideration of dependency measures that can be defined on the support of the observed failure times. Two such measures, the correlation between marginal martingales, and a cumulative cross ratio statistic, are discussed and corresponding nonparametric estimators are proposed.