跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以交替治疗资料推断持续治疗下的事件分布,涉及治疗方案反事实的推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Beth Ann Griffin
Stephen Lagakos

交替治疗安排研究中的失效时间数据分析

研究问题
当研究对象按设计停用并重新使用治疗时,如何推断持续治疗下的事件时间分布、比较两种持续治疗,并评估协变量作用?
方法与思路
作者构造持续治疗累积风险的非参数估计与组间检验,分析其渐近性质,并在比例风险模型下研究偏似然方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在有关治疗中断影响的条件下,估计量一致且渐近正态;还比较交替与平行组设计,并以模拟及药物研究展示方法。
阅读关注点
应重点核对中断治疗的影响条件、交替观察向持续治疗目标的连接方式,以及检验有效性和比例风险模型的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未列出治疗中断条件及设计比较结果,不能直接将交替治疗数据解释为持续治疗效果。

原文摘要

We develop statistical methods for designing and analyzing studies in which treatments are deliberately interrupted and reinitiated, but where interest lies in making inferences about continuous treatment use. We refer to such designs as alternating designs, because subjects alternate between periods in which they are taking the treatment of interest and periods when they are not. Our goals are to determine how to estimate the distribution of time to an event if the treatment were given continuously, to compare the distributions of two such continuously given treatments, and to assess the effects of covariates on the distribution of a continuously given treatment. We examine a nonparametric estimator of the cumulative hazard function for continuous treatment using data from an alternating design and show it to be uniformly consistent and asymptotically normal under certain conditions relating to the effects of interrupting the treatment. We then introduce nonparametric tests for comparing the distributions corresponding to two such continuously given treatments and derive their asymptotic properties under general alternatives to the null and under various conditions related to the interruption of treatment. We compare the properties of the alternating treatment design and the classical parallel group design and present results from a simulation study that assesses the size and power of the test procedures introduced. Finally, we examine partial likelihood methods for assessing the effects of covariates and continuous treatment on time until an event under a proportional hazards model. We illustrate the proposed methods using the results from a recent study in which subjects alternate between taking an active drug and placebo on an annual basis.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文