跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究多阶段整群随机试验中自适应干预因果效应的推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Wenchu Pan
Daniel Almirall
Amy M. Kilbourne
Andrew Quanbeck
Lu Wang

利用整群 SMART 数据比较整群自适应干预的有限样本校正

研究问题
在集群数量较少的多阶段随机试验中,如何改善整群自适应干预因果效应比较的标准误估计与统计推断?
方法与思路
作者研究方差估计的自由度缩放、使用 t 分布及偏差校正方差估计,并为整群序贯多重分配随机试验扩展相关方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提出适用于 cSMART 的有限样本校正,特别扩展了偏差校正方差方法,并通过模拟及学校 CBT 实施研究展示应用。
阅读关注点
核对序贯随机化与响应依赖概率的处理、集群层面自由度和方差校正公式,以及少量集群下的覆盖率与检验表现。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,不能据此认定已通过同行评审或被期刊接收;摘要未说明各校正方法的数值表现及适用集群数量。

原文摘要

Adaptive interventions, aka dynamic treatment regimens, are sequences of pre-specified decision rules that guide the provision of treatment for an individual given information about their baseline and evolving needs, including in response to prior intervention. Clustered adaptive interventions (cAIs) extend this idea by guiding the provision of intervention at the level of clusters (e.g., clinics), but with the goal of improving outcomes at the level of individuals within the cluster (e.g., clinicians or patients within clinics). A clustered, sequential multiple-assignment randomized trials (cSMARTs) is a multistage, multilevel randomized trial design used to construct high-quality cAIs. In a cSMART, clusters are randomized at multiple intervention decision points; at each decision point, the randomization probability can depend on response to prior data. A challenge in cluster-randomized trials, including cSMARTs, is the deleterious effect of small samples of clusters on statistical inference, particularly via estimation of standard errors. \par This manuscript develops finite-sample adjustment (FSA) methods for making improved statistical inference about the causal effects of cAIs in a cSMART. The paper develops FSA methods that (i) scale variance estimators using a degree-of-freedom adjustment, (ii) reference a t distribution (instead of a normal), and (iii) employ a ``bias corrected" variance estimator. Method (iii) requires extensions that are unique to the analysis of cSMARTs. Extensive simulation experiments are used to test the performance of the methods. The methods are illustrated using the Adaptive School-based Implementation of CBT (ASIC) study, a cSMART designed to construct a cAI for improving the delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) by school mental health professionals within high schools in Michigan.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文