跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:多项逻辑回归用于文本计数与降维,摘要未研究经济主体的离散选择或所列其他细分问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Matt Taddy

用于文本分析的多项逆回归

研究问题
如何将高维词组计数压缩为保留情感信息的低维文档表示,并稳定估计具有高维响应的多项逻辑回归?
方法与思路
作者将词组计数对文档标注作多项逆回归,使用系数尺度未知的独立 Laplace 先验,并联合最大化系数和尺度的后验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提出情感充分降维框架和 gamma-lasso 估计方案,讨论算法收敛与估计性质,并通过两个实例及样本外预测展示效果。
阅读关注点
核对情感充分性的准确含义、标注与词频建模假设、先验尺度的设定,以及样本外评价是否避免信息泄漏。
阅读边界
材料为 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;降维成立条件和预测数值未提供,作者对广泛优势的判断不能视为已验证结论。

原文摘要

Text data, including speeches, stories, and other document forms, are often connected to sentiment variables that are of interest for research in marketing, economics, and elsewhere. It is also very high dimensional and difficult to incorporate into statistical analyses. This article introduces a straightforward framework of sentiment-sufficient dimension reduction for text data. Multinomial inverse regression is introduced as a general tool for simplifying predictor sets that can be represented as draws from a multinomial distribution, and we show that logistic regression of phrase counts onto document annotations can be used to obtain low-dimensional document representations that are rich in sentiment information. To facilitate this modeling, a novel estimation technique is developed for multinomial logistic regression with very high-dimensional response. In particular, independent Laplace priors with unknown variance are assigned to each regression coefficient, and we detail an efficient routine for maximization of the joint posterior over coefficients and their prior scale. This “gamma-lasso” scheme yields stable and effective estimation for general high-dimensional logistic regression, and we argue that it will be superior to current methods in many settings. Guidelines for prior specification are provided, algorithm convergence is detailed, and estimator properties are outlined from the perspective of the literature on nonconcave likelihood penalization. Related work on sentiment analysis from statistics, econometrics, and machine learning is surveyed and connected. Finally, the methods are applied in two detailed examples and we provide out-of-sample prediction studies to illustrate their effectiveness.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文