跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以阈值决定处理的断点回归设计为背景,研究阈值处平均处理效应的置信区间,直接对应因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Sebastian Calonico
Matias D. Cattaneo
Rocio Titiunik

断点回归设计的稳健非参数置信区间

研究问题
断点回归中,数据驱动带宽导致的局部多项式估计偏差如何影响处理效应区间覆盖率,如何构造更可靠的置信区间?
方法与思路
作者把偏差校正的断点回归估计量与新的标准误估计结合,构造适用于清晰、模糊断点及对应折点设计的稳健置信区间。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新理论支持在稳健区间中使用均方误差最优带宽;模拟显示覆盖率接近名义水平,平均区间长度表现良好。
阅读关注点
核对偏差校正与方差公式、带宽和多项式阶数的选择,以及四类设计各自的识别条件、模拟设置与覆盖率结果。
阅读边界
摘要未列出完整识别条件与正则条件,也未给出模拟参数和具体数值;所述覆盖率表现不能保证每个实证样本都适用。

原文摘要

In the regression-discontinuity (RD) design, units are assigned to treatment based on whether their value of an observed covariate exceeds a known cutoff. In this design, local polynomial estimators are now routinely employed to construct confidence intervals for treatment effects. The performance of these confidence intervals in applications, however, may be seriously hampered by their sensitivity to the specific bandwidth employed. Available bandwidth selectors typically yield a “large” bandwidth, leading to data-driven confidence intervals that may be biased, with empirical coverage well below their nominal target. We propose new theory-based, more robust confidence interval estimators for average treatment effects at the cutoff in sharp RD, sharp kink RD, fuzzy RD, and fuzzy kink RD designs. Our proposed confidence intervals are constructed using a bias-corrected RD estimator together with a novel standard error estimator. For practical implementation, we discuss mean squared error optimal bandwidths, which are by construction not valid for conventional confidence intervals but are valid with our robust approach, and consistent standard error estimators based on our new variance formulas. In a special case of practical interest, our procedure amounts to running a quadratic instead of a linear local regression. More generally, our results give a formal justification to simple inference procedures based on increasing the order of the local polynomial estimator employed. We find in a simulation study that our confidence intervals exhibit close-to-correct empirical coverage and good empirical interval length on average, remarkably improving upon the alternatives available in the literature. All results are readily available in R and STATA using our companion software packages described in Calonico, Cattaneo, and Titiunik (2014d, 2014b).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文