跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于竞争风险与生存分析,所述原因别失效并不构成所列因果推断方向的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

On the Use of Cause-Specific Failure and Conditional Failure Probabilities: Examples from Clinical Oncology Data

特定死因失效概率与条件失效概率的使用:临床肿瘤数据示例

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jeffrey J. Gaynor
Eric J. Feuer
Claire C. Tan
Danny H. Wu
Claudia R. Little
David J. Straus
Bayard D. Clarkson
Murray F. Brennan

特定死因失效概率与条件失效概率的使用:临床肿瘤数据示例

研究问题
存在竞争失效原因时,如何估计特定原因的累计失效概率,并区分协变量对风险率与失效概率组成部分的关联?
方法与思路
作者讨论非参数极大似然估计,比较累计失效概率与风险曲线,并用混合模型拆分最终失效概率和条件失效时间。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要以肿瘤数据说明,将其他原因失效视为删失后用一减KM估计累计概率可能产生偏差,并展示不同指标的解释差异。
阅读关注点
应核对累计失效概率、原因别风险与条件时间分布的定义,关注删失处理、协变量解释和观测范围外的外推问题。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;示例中的协变量关联不能直接解释为因果效应,具体估计条件与外推依据未说明。

原文摘要

Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation of the probability of failing from a particular cause by time t in the presence of other acting causes (i.e., the cause-specific failure probability) is discussed. A commonly used incorrect approach is to take 1 minus the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator (1 – KM), whereby patients who fail of extraneous causes are treated as censored observations. Examples showing the extent of bias in using the 1-KM approach are presented using clinical oncology data. This bias can be quite large if the data are uncensored or if a large percentage of patients fail from extraneous causes prior to the occurrence of failures from the cause of interest. Each cause-specific failure probability is mathematically defined as a function of all of the cause-specific hazards. Therefore, nonparametric estimates of the cause-specific failure probabilities may not be able to identify categorized covariate effects on the cause-specific hazards. These effects would be correctly identified by cause-specific cumulative hazard or KM plots in which the extraneous causes of failure are treated as censored observations. Examples are provided. Finally, nonparametric graphical representation of the two distinct cause-specific failure components of the mixture model (i.e., the probability of ever failing from a particular cause and the time-to-failure distribution given that a patient will fail of that cause) are presented. The difficulty in extrapolating the nonparametric estimates beyond the range of observed failure times is highlighted. In addition, the mathematical relationship of a single covariate z and the two cause-specific failure components is shown for the case where z acts multiplicatively on the cause-specific hazards. Examples are considered using the important prognostic factors in adult soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In each of the mathematical and actual examples considered, the characteristic that was associated with a higher hazard rate of failure from the disease was also associated with a higher probability of ever failing from the disease as well as a shorter time-to-failure distribution given that failure due to the disease will occur. Thus it may be quite common in chronic disease situations to find prognosticators that are associated with both cause-specific failure components.

笔记与分组