跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究随机试验中的亚组治疗效应估计及效应异质性,直接属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

Using shrinkage methods to estimate treatment effects in overlapping subgroups in randomized clinical trials with a time-to-event endpoint

用收缩方法估计生存终点随机试验中重叠亚组的治疗效应

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Marcel Wolbers
Ke Li
Kaspar Rufibach

用收缩方法估计生存终点随机试验中重叠亚组的治疗效应

研究问题
随机临床试验中,同一受试者属于多个亚组时,如何稳定估计生存终点的亚组治疗效应,并兼顾小样本波动、多亚组分析和真实异质性?
方法与思路
作者先用全部观测拟合包含治疗与分类协变量交互项的 Cox 模型,采用 lasso、ridge 或正则化 horseshoe 先验,再边际化获得亚组效应。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所研究模拟情景中收缩估计降低总体均方误差,但对异质亚组产生一定偏差;贝叶斯方案提供可信区间,方法已实现于 bonsaiforest。
阅读关注点
应核对边际化后治疗效应的定义、交互项与重叠亚组的对应关系,以及收缩强度选择;重点检查异质亚组的偏差和可信区间表现。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未获核实;摘要未说明完整模拟条件及区间覆盖表现,均方误差改善不能推及所有异质性结构。

原文摘要

In randomized controlled trials, forest plots are frequently used to investigate the homogeneity of treatment effect estimates in subgroups. However, the interpretation of subgroup-specific treatment effect estimates requires great care due to the smaller sample size of subgroups and the large number of investigated subgroups. Bayesian shrinkage methods have been proposed to address these issues, but they often focus on disjoint subgroups while subgroups displayed in forest plots are overlapping, i.e., each subject appears in multiple subgroups. In our approach, we first build a flexible Cox model based on all available observations, including categorical covariates that identify the subgroups of interest and their interactions with the treatment group variable. We explore both penalized partial likelihood estimation with a lasso or ridge penalty for treatment-by-covariate interaction terms, and Bayesian estimation with a regularized horseshoe prior. One advantage of the Bayesian approach is the ability to derive credible intervals for shrunken subgroup-specific estimates. In a second step, the Cox model is marginalized to obtain treatment effect estimates for all subgroups. We illustrate these methods using data from a randomized clinical trial in follicular lymphoma and evaluate their properties in a simulation study. In all simulation scenarios, the overall mean-squared error is substantially smaller for penalized and shrinkage estimators compared to the standard subgroup-specific treatment effect estimator but leads to some bias for heterogeneous subgroups. We recommend that subgroup-specific estimators, which are typically displayed in forest plots, are more routinely complemented by treatment effect estimators based on shrinkage methods. The proposed methods are implemented in the R package bonsaiforest.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文