Regret Equals Covariance: A Closed-Form Characterization for Stochastic Optimization
遗憾与协方差:随机优化的闭式刻画AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心为一般随机优化理论,Markowitz 仅作为例子,未明确开展资产定价、金融风险或收益预测研究。
反馈分类问题遗憾与协方差:随机优化的闭式刻画AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Quantifying regret typically involves repeatedly re-solving a stochastic optimization problem across simulated scenarios. Such an approach is costly: the cost scales with the number of scenarios and the cost of each solve. We propose that regret can instead be measured using the joint moments of the cost vector $c$ and the optimal decision $π^*(c)$. Working with the optimal concave and Lipschitz under only a feasible region value function $v(c) = \min_{z\in Z} c^\top z$, we show that regret always decomposes as $\mathrm{Regret} = -\mathrm{Cov}(c,π^*(c)) - R(c)$ for a residual $R(c)$. We further show that $R(c)=0$ when $π^*$ is affine in $c$, which holds for unconstrained and equality-constrained (e.g., budget-constrained Markowitz) quadratic programs and many, but not all, linear programs. For all cases, we give a distribution-free bound $\mathrm{Regret} \le D\sqrt{\mathrm{tr}(Σ_c)}$ that depends only on the radius of the feasible region and the cost covariance. We also derive concentration and asymptotic-normality results for the empirical regret, the latter under an explicit and checkable non-degeneracy condition.