跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要的应用是基因测序关联检验,集成检验本身也未明确对应所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yaowu Liu
Zhonghua Liu
Xihong Lin

检验全局原假设的集成方法

研究问题
面对不同类型的备择假设,如何组合多个较弱的基础检验,以提高全局原假设检验的功效及其稳健性?
方法与思路
作者借鉴随机森林的集成思想聚合基础检验,针对全基因组测序关联研究中的四类问题设计具体检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,具体检验具有 Bahadur 效率意义下的理论最优性,并以模拟和真实测序数据展示错误率控制或功效增益。
阅读关注点
应核对基础检验的生成和聚合方式、最终检验的校准,以及 Bahadur 最优性对应的备择类别和比较基准。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 摘要;理论条件和数值结果未提供,摘要所述最优性不能理解为所有备择下的统一最优。

原文摘要

Abstract Testing a global null is a canonical problem in statistics and has a wide range of applications. In view of the fact that no uniformly most powerful test exists, prior and/or domain knowledge are commonly used to focus on a certain class of alternatives to improve the testing power. However, it is generally challenging to develop tests that are particularly powerful against a certain class of alternatives. In this paper, motivated by the success of ensemble learning methods for prediction or classification, we propose an ensemble framework for testing that mimics the spirit of random forests to deal with the challenges. Our ensemble testing framework aggregates a collection of weak base tests to form a final ensemble test that maintains strong and robust power for global nulls. We apply the framework to four problems about global testing in different classes of alternatives arising from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) association studies. Specific ensemble tests are proposed for each of these problems, and their theoretical optimality is established in terms of Bahadur efficiency. Extensive simulations and an analysis of a real WGS dataset are conducted to demonstrate the type I error control and/or power gain of the proposed ensemble tests.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文