跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究异方差 VAR 中的协整关系、调整系数及相应假设检验。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
H. Peter Boswijk
Giuseppe Cavaliere
Anders Rahbek
A.M. Robert Taylor

异方差向量自回归中的协整参数推断

研究问题
VAR 冲击存在未知的条件及无条件异方差时,协整关系系数和调整系数的传统极大似然推断是否可靠,如何修正?
方法与思路
作者分析传统估计与似然比检验的失效,讨论使用三明治方差的 Wald 检验和 wild bootstrap,并给出渐近有效条件。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称无需指定参数化波动模型即可开展替代推断,自助法在模拟中改善有限样本尺寸,美国利率期限结构应用展示推断差异。
阅读关注点
应核对允许的异方差及依赖结构、协整秩处理、方差估计和自助重抽样步骤,以及参数约束检验的有效性条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断完整条件、尺寸改善幅度或利率应用中的具体结论;传统推断并非在所有异方差情形都失效。

原文摘要

We consider estimation and hypothesis testing on the coefficients of the co-integrating relations and the adjustment coefficients in vector autoregressions driven by shocks which display both conditional and unconditional heteroskedasticity of a quite general and unknown form. We show that the conventional results in Johansen (1996) for the maximum likelihood estimators and associated likelihood ratio tests derived under homoskedasticity do not in general hold under heteroskedasticity. As a result, standard confidence intervals and hypothesis tests on these coefficients are potentially unreliable. Solutions based on Wald tests (using a “sandwich” estimator of the variance matrix) and on the use of the wild bootstrap are discussed. These do not require the practitioner to specify a parametric model for volatility. We establish the conditions under which these methods are asymptotically valid. A Monte Carlo simulation study demonstrates that significant improvements in finite sample size can be obtained by the bootstrap over the corresponding asymptotic tests in both heteroskedastic and homoskedastic environments. An application to the term structure of interest rates in the US illustrates the difference between standard and bootstrap inferences regarding hypotheses on the co-integrating vectors and adjustment coefficients.

笔记与分组