跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般贝叶斯模型检验及天文、工程应用,没有给定经济计量细分的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Dalia Chakrabarty

检验为克服计算不可解性而引入假设的新贝叶斯检验

研究问题
当复杂模型难以计算、简化假设使参数学习成为可能,而贝叶斯因子含未知的数据依赖常数时,如何衡量数据对简化假设的支持?
方法与思路
作者从原假设成立的模型生成数据,比较实测与生成数据下的边际后验,并通过 MCMC 对相应参数区域积分以定义支持度。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出绕开贝叶斯因子计算的检验,并讨论跨数据集比较支持度的解释问题;以星系各向同性及 O-ring 数据作应用。
阅读关注点
应核对支持度的精确定义、生成数据方案、参数区域判定与先验作用,并审视支持度被解释为原假设条件概率的依据。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未说明检验校准与完整适用条件,不能独立确认星系解释或支持度的概率性质。

原文摘要

We present a new test of hypothesis in which we seek the probability of the null conditioned on the data, where the null is a simplification undertaken to counter the intractability of the more complex model that the simpler null model is nested within. With the more complex model rendered intractable, the null model uses a simplifying assumption that capacitates the learning of an unknown parameter vector given the data. Bayes factors are shown to be known only up to a ratio of unknown data-dependent constants—a problem that cannot be cured using prescriptions similar to those suggested to solve the problem caused to Bayes factor computation, by noninformative priors. Thus, a new test is needed in which we can circumvent Bayes factor computation. In this test, we undertake generation of data from the model in which the null hypothesis is true and can achieve support in the measured data for the null by comparing the marginalized posterior of the model parameter given the measured data, to that given such generated data. However, such a ratio of marginalized posteriors can confound interpretation of comparison of support in one measured data for a null, with that in another dataset for a different null. Given an application in which such comparison is undertaken, we alternatively define support in a measured dataset for a null by identifying the model parameters that are less consistent with the measured data than is minimally possible given the generated data, and realizing that the higher the number of such parameter values, less is the support in the measured data for the null. Then, the probability of the null conditional on the data is given within a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based scheme, by marginalizing the posterior given the measured data, over parameter values that are as, or more consistent with the measured data, than with the generated data. In the aforementioned application, we test the hypothesis that a galactic state-space bears an isotropic geometry, where the (missing) data comprising measurements of some components of the state-space vector of a sample of observed galactic particles are implemented to Bayesianly learn the gravitational mass density of all matter in the galaxy. In lieu of an assumption about the state-space being isotropic, the likelihood of the sought gravitational mass density given the data is intractable. For a real example galaxy, we find unequal values of the probability of the null—that the host state-space is isotropic—given two different datasets, implying that in this galaxy, the system state-space constitutes at least two disjoint sub-volumes that the two datasets, respectively, live in. Implementation on simulated galactic data is also undertaken, as is an empirical illustration on the well-known O-ring data, to test for the form of the thermal variation of the failure probability of the O-rings. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文