Miscellanea. A stopping rule for the continual reassessment method
短论:持续再评估方法的停止规则AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究临床剂量探索中的序贯停止规则,未提供所列计量经济学细分方向的直接依据。
反馈分类问题短论:持续再评估方法的停止规则AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The continual reassessment method provides a new approach for estimating the maximum tolerated dose in a phase I clinical trial. In this paper we investigate a potential stopping rule for this method. We indicate certain situations in which the finally chosen dose level can be predicted with certainty after having included a number of patients strictly less than the projected sample size. There is therefore a clear gain when the only purpose of the trial is to identify a target dose for future experimentation. When prediction with certainty is not possible, we can still estimate the probability that the current level will be the same as all subsequent recommended levels.