Empirical Likelihood Inference in Nonlinear Errors-in-Covariables Models With Validation Data
利用验证数据对非线性协变量测量误差模型进行经验似然推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究验证数据下的测量误差回归与经验似然,未明确涉及因果、面板或其他所列领域细分。
利用验证数据对非线性协变量测量误差模型进行经验似然推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In this article we study inference in parametric–nonparametric errors-in-covariables regression models using an empirical likelihood approach based on validation data. It is shown that the asymptotic behavior of the proposed estimator depends on the ratio of the sizes of the primary sample and the validation sample, respectively. Unlike cases without measurement errors, the limit distribution of the estimator is no longer tractable and cannot be used for constructing confidence regions. Monte Carlo approximations are employed to simulate the limit distribution. To increase the coverage accuracy of confidence regions, two adjusted empirical likelihood estimators are recommended, which in the limit have a standard chi-squared distribution. A simulation study is carried out to compare the proposed methods with other existing methods. The new methods outperform the least squares method, and one of them works better than simulation–extrapolation (SIMEX) estimation, even when the restrictive model assumptions needed for SIMEX are satisfied. An application to a real dataset illustrates our new approach.