Sufficient Dimension Reduction With Missing Predictors
预测变量缺失时的充分降维AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究缺失预测变量下的一般降维,双重稳健性本身不构成因果推断分类依据。
预测变量缺失时的充分降维AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In high-dimensional data analysis, sufficient dimension reduction (SDR) methods are effective in reducing the predictor dimension, while retaining full regression information and imposing no parametric models. However, it is common in high-dimensional data that a subset of predictors may have missing observations. Existing SDR methods resort to the complete-case analysis by removing all the subjects with missingness in any of the predictors under inquiry. Such an approach does not make effective use of the data and is valid only when missingness is independent of both observed and unobserved quantities. In this article, we propose a new class of SDR estimators under a more general missingness mechanism that allows missingness to depend on the observed data. We focus on a widely used SDR method, sliced inverse regression, and propose an augmented inverse probability weighted sliced inverse regression estimator (AIPW–SIR). We show that AIPW–SIR is doubly robust and asymptotically consistent and demonstrate that AIPW–SIR is more effective than the complete-case analysis through both simulations and real data analysis. We also outline the extension of the AIPW strategy to other SDR methods, including sliced average variance estimation and principal Hessian directions.