Adaptive critical value for constrained likelihood ratio testing
约束似然比检验的自适应临界值AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是通用约束检验,流动性偏好应用未明确对应所列金融或宏观领域细分。
约束似然比检验的自适应临界值AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary We present a new general method for constrained likelihood ratio testing which, when few constraints are violated, improves upon the existing approach in the literature that compares the likelihood ratio with the quantile of a mixture of chi-squared distributions; the improvement is in terms of both simplicity and power. The proposed method compares the constrained likelihood ratio statistic against the quantile of only one chi-squared random variable with data-dependent degrees of freedom. The new test is shown to have a valid exact significance level $\alpha$. It also has more power than the classical approach against alternatives for which the number of violations is not large. We provide more details for testing a simple order $\mu_1\leqslant\cdots\leqslant\mu_p$ against all alternatives using the proposed approach and give clear guidelines as to when the new method would be advantageous. A simulation study suggests that for testing a simple order, the new approach is more powerful in many scenarios than the existing method that uses a mixture of chi-squared variables. We illustrate the results of our adaptive procedure using real data on the liquidity preference hypothesis.