SLOW MOVERS IN PANEL DATA
面板数据中的缓慢变动个体AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究含不变与缓慢变动个体的面板数据及平均偏效应推断。
面板数据中的缓慢变动个体AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Panel data often contain stayers and slow movers . The literature proposes an estimator for the average partial effects (APEs) for this setting without a formal theory. The literature is also silent about inference in the presence of stayers and many slow movers. We contribute to this state of the art. First, we develop an asymptotic theory to guarantee that such an estimator is consistent in the presence of stayers and slow movers. Second, we propose its standard error. Third, we relax the existing assumption to allow for “many” slow movers. Fourth, we generalize the existing estimator. Fifth, we establish that this generalized estimator can achieve larger extents of bias reduction and hence faster convergence rates. Simulation studies demonstrate that the conventional 95% confidence interval covers the true value of the APE with 37%–93% frequencies whereas our proposed one achieves 93%–96% coverage frequencies. Using the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we find that estimates of the marginal propensity to consume based on our generalized estimator remarkably differ in values from those of the existing estimators. Moreover, the generalized estimator achieves more than three times as small standard errors as those of the existing robust estimator.