Constrained Regression for Interval-Valued Data
区间值数据的约束回归AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确在区间时间序列框架下构建上下界的动态二元系统,并讨论区间拟合与预测,因此直接对应时间序列方向。
区间值数据的约束回归AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Current regression models for interval-valued data do not guarantee that the predicted lower bound of the interval is always smaller than its upper bound. We propose a constrained regression model that preserves the natural order of the interval in all instances, either for in-sample fitted intervals or for interval forecasts. Within the framework of interval time series, we specify a general dynamic bivariate system for the upper and lower bounds of the intervals. By imposing the order of the interval bounds into the model, the bivariate probability density function of the errors becomes conditionally truncated. In this context, the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimators of the parameters of the system are inconsistent. Estimation by maximum likelihood is possible but it is computationally burdensome due to the nonlinearity of the estimator when there is truncation. We propose a two-step procedure that combines maximum likelihood and least squares estimation and a modified two-step procedure that combines maximum likelihood and minimum-distance estimation. In both instances, the estimators are consistent. However, when multicollinearity arises in the second step of the estimation, the modified two-step procedure is superior at identifying the model regardless of the severity of the truncation. Monte Carlo simulations show good finite sample properties of the proposed estimators. A comparison with the current methods in the literature shows that our proposed methods are superior by delivering smaller losses and better estimators (no bias and low mean squared errors) than those from competing approaches. We illustrate our approach with the daily interval of low/high SP500 returns and find that truncation is very severe during and after the financial crisis of 2008, so OLS estimates should not be trusted and a modified two-step procedure should be implemented. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.