跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确在区间时间序列框架下构建上下界的动态二元系统,并讨论区间拟合与预测,因此直接对应时间序列方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Wei Lin

区间值数据的约束回归

研究问题
区间值回归如何保证拟合及预测区间的下界始终小于上界,并在边界排序引致误差条件截断时获得一致的参数估计?
方法与思路
作者为上下界建立动态二元系统并施加顺序约束,再提出结合极大似然与最小二乘、以及极大似然与最小距离的两类两步估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两类估计量均一致,修正版在第二步多重共线性下更能识别模型;模拟报告较小损失与均方误差,并展示标普500收益区间应用。
阅读关注点
重点核对条件截断如何进入似然、一致性所需假设及两步估计的具体实现;再看多重共线性处理与金融危机前后的样本比较。
阅读边界
一致性与比较优势均是摘要陈述,截断分布、约束形式和模拟设计未说明;不能据此认定修正版适用于所有区间数据或危机样本。

原文摘要

Current regression models for interval-valued data do not guarantee that the predicted lower bound of the interval is always smaller than its upper bound. We propose a constrained regression model that preserves the natural order of the interval in all instances, either for in-sample fitted intervals or for interval forecasts. Within the framework of interval time series, we specify a general dynamic bivariate system for the upper and lower bounds of the intervals. By imposing the order of the interval bounds into the model, the bivariate probability density function of the errors becomes conditionally truncated. In this context, the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimators of the parameters of the system are inconsistent. Estimation by maximum likelihood is possible but it is computationally burdensome due to the nonlinearity of the estimator when there is truncation. We propose a two-step procedure that combines maximum likelihood and least squares estimation and a modified two-step procedure that combines maximum likelihood and minimum-distance estimation. In both instances, the estimators are consistent. However, when multicollinearity arises in the second step of the estimation, the modified two-step procedure is superior at identifying the model regardless of the severity of the truncation. Monte Carlo simulations show good finite sample properties of the proposed estimators. A comparison with the current methods in the literature shows that our proposed methods are superior by delivering smaller losses and better estimators (no bias and low mean squared errors) than those from competing approaches. We illustrate our approach with the daily interval of low/high SP500 returns and find that truncation is very severe during and after the financial crisis of 2008, so OLS estimates should not be trusted and a modified two-step procedure should be implemented. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文