跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用贝叶斯变量选择与模型错设,没有直接指向所列领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David Rossell
Francisco J. Rubio

超越正态假设的可处理贝叶斯变量选择

研究问题
贝叶斯变量选择依赖正态误差时,模型错设如何影响稀疏性与信号识别,能否在保留计算便利的同时容纳偏态和厚尾?
方法与思路
作者扩展误差分布以容纳偏态和厚尾,保留对数凹似然,分析错设下参数与贝叶斯因子渐近行为,并结合非局部先验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,适当条件下错设仍可保持稀疏性速率,但信号检测速率会受指数因子影响;估计误差分布可缓解这些问题。
阅读关注点
应核对误差分布族、错设条件与信号检测速率的具体定义,并区分似然调整和非局部先验各自带来的作用。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;分布形式、渐近条件及改善幅度未说明,提及软件包不代表已核验实现,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Bayesian variable selection often assumes normality, but the effects of model misspecification are not sufficiently understood. There are sound reasons behind this assumption, particularly for large p: ease of interpretation, analytical, and computational convenience. More flexible frameworks exist, including semi- or nonparametric models, often at the cost of some tractability. We propose a simple extension that allows for skewness and thicker-than-normal tails but preserves tractability. It leads to easy interpretation and a log-concave likelihood that facilitates optimization and integration. We characterize asymptotically parameter estimation and Bayes factor rates, under certain model misspecification. Under suitable conditions, misspecified Bayes factors induce sparsity at the same rates than under the correct model. However, the rates to detect signal change by an exponential factor, often reducing sensitivity. These deficiencies can be ameliorated by inferring the error distribution, a simple strategy that can improve inference substantially. Our work focuses on the likelihood and can be combined with any likelihood penalty or prior, but here we focus on nonlocal priors to induce extra sparsity and ameliorate finite-sample effects caused by misspecification. We show the importance of considering the likelihood rather than solely the prior, for Bayesian variable selection. The methodology is in R package ‘mombf.’ Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文