The Structural Bite: A Methodological Framework for Minimum Wage Studies using Spanish Administrative Data
结构性冲击强度：利用西班牙行政数据研究最低工资的方法框架AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要利用行政数据、双重差分、事件研究和三重差分评估最低工资对青年就业的因果影响。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
结构性冲击强度：利用西班牙行政数据研究最低工资的方法框架
- 研究问题
- 西班牙 2019 年最低工资大幅上调如何影响青年就业，处理强度定义和同期旅游相关疫情冲击会怎样影响政策评估？
- 方法与思路
- 作者用行政税务数据构造多种处理强度，包括指数倾斜形成的指标，结合双重差分、事件研究、HonestDiD 与旅游依赖三重差分。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称结果未显示青年净就业损失，弹性区间包含零；三重差分分析将 2020 年就业下降主要归于旅游部门受到的疫情冲击。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对处理强度的经济含义、平行趋势与敏感性设定、异质效应下双向固定效应的解释，以及疫情冲击的区分依据。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，同行评审或期刊接收未经核实；区间包含零不能证明效应为零，摘要也不足以判断识别有效性或跨情境适用性。
原文摘要
We study the employment effects of the 22% increase in the Spanish minimum wage in 2019, focusing on young workers. Using census-grade administrative tax data covering the universe of formal wage bills and employment (Models 190/390 linked to personal income tax records), we construct several measures of treatment intensity, including two structurally grounded bite indicators based on the incidence of young minimum-wage workers and the implied increase in the wage bill obtained via Exponential Tilting. Difference-in-differences estimates with two-way fixed effects, dynamic event-study specifications, and robust confidence intervals from the HonestDiD framework all point to the same conclusion: the reform did not generate net disemployment effects for young workers. Point estimates of the elasticity are small and often positive, and confidence internals comfortably include zero even with sizable deviations from parallel trends. A triple-difference design exploiting pre-existing tourism dependence further shows that the sharp employment collapse of 2020 is primarily explained by the COVID-19 shock operating through tourism-intensive sectors, rather than by the minimum-wage hike itself. Our results suggest that, in the macroeconomic and institutional environment prevailing in Spain in 2019, with the minimum wage rising to around 60% of the average wage in a recovering economy, the labour market absorbed a large discrete increase in the wage floor without destroying aggregate youth employment. More broadly, the paper highlights how the choice of treatment definition, the use of census-grade data, robust DiD inference, and explicit modelling of concurrent shocks can shape conclusions about the effects of minimum-wage policies.