Dating the timeline of financial bubbles during the subprime crisis
次贷危机期间金融泡沫起止时间的测定AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确以递归回归分析金融时间序列，并识别泡沫出现和崩溃的状态转变时点。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
次贷危机期间金融泡沫起止时间的测定
- 研究问题
- 如何识别金融时间序列的泡沫行为并一致估计其形成与破裂时点，以及如何检验泡沫在房地产、商品和债券市场间的迁移？
- 方法与思路
- 作者修改既有递归回归方法，构造泡沫检测与起止时间估计程序，并提出跨市场迁移检验，应用于房价、原油价格和债券利差。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，方法可一致测定泡沫起止时间，三个序列均呈显著泡沫特征；估计时序与迁移检验支持作者所描述的跨市场迁移机制。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对递归窗口、临界值与起止判定规则、一致性所需条件，以及迁移检验如何处理共同冲击和不同市场间的时序依赖。
- 阅读边界
- 仅依据所给 OpenAlex 版本摘要；检验设定与误报表现未说明，泡沫时序及迁移检验不能单独确立市场间因果传播或实际预警能力。
原文摘要
A new recursive regression methodology is introduced to analyze the bubble characteristics of various financial time series during the subprime crisis. The methods modify a technique proposed in Phillips, Wu, and Yu (2011) and provide a technology for identifying bubble behavior with consistent dating of their origination and collapse. The tests serve as an early warning diagnostic of bubble activity and a new procedure is introduced for testing bubble migration across markets. Three relevant financial series are investigated, including a financial asset price (a house price index), a commodity price (the crude oil price), and one bond price (the spread between Baa and Aaa). Statistically significant bubble characteristics are found in all of these series. The empirical estimates of the origination and collapse dates suggest a migration mechanism among the financial variables. A bubble emerged in the real estate market in February 2002. After the subprime crisis erupted in 2007, the phenomenon migrated selectively into the commodity market and the bond market, creating bubbles which subsequently burst at the end of 2008, just as the effects on the real economy and economic growth became manifest. Our empirical estimates of the origination and collapse dates and tests of migration across markets match well with the general dateline of the crisis put forward in the recent study by Caballero, Farhi, and Gourinchas (2008a).