跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确针对分类面板数据,使用同一个体七年的重复响应及个体协变量,直接对应面板数据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zvi Gilula
Shelby J. Haberman

用于分类面板数据分析的条件对数线性模型

研究问题
如何利用个体历次分类响应及协变量预测当前响应,并以预测能力比较面板模型,而不只依赖传统拟合优度检验?
方法与思路
作者构建包含马尔可夫、独立及距离模型的条件对数线性框架,用对数惩罚及其期望减少比例衡量预测能力。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,给出预测函数、预测质量及其大样本精度和偏差评估;青年纵向调查应用中,历史响应比人口特征联系更强。
阅读关注点
应核对条件概率的历史信息集、预测惩罚的估计与参数数量调整,以及删失和无应答情形下的方法适用条件。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;预测比较的具体估计细节及无应答处理条件未说明,应用中的关联不能直接解释为因果效应。

原文摘要

Conditional log-linear models are developed for panel data and used to predict sequences of categorical responses. The class of models considered includes conventional Markov models and independence models as well as distance models in which all previous responses and present and past values of covariates are used to predict the current response. The approach taken in this article has some advantages over the marginal modeling approach that has become popular for longitudinal studies. Quality of prediction is measured by using a logarithmic penalty function. Given a model, conditional probabilities of responses consistent with the model are selected to provide the smallest expected penalty. This minimum expected penalty provides a measure of the predictive power of a model. Models are compared through their predictive power, as measured by the proportional reduction in expected penalty. Ways of incorporating the number of parameters of the competing models are discussed. This emphasis on predictive power contrasts with the conventional emphasis on goodness-of-fit tests. In the case of random sampling, estimates are provided for optimal prediction functions consistent with the model and for measures of predictive power. Large-sample approximations are provided for assessing the accuracy of parameter estimates and of estimated measures of quality of prediction. For measures of quality of prediction, assessments are provided for the bias of estimates. To illustrate techniques, analyses are performed on data from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth on attitudes toward a military career. Because these data are available for the same subject for each of seven years, and because demographic data are available on individual subjects, these data provide a nontrivial application. Because more than 8,000 observations are available, statistical models of practical interest do not fit the data according to conventional criteria, but they still have value in predicting subject responses. Analysis of the data shows that subjects' responses are linked much more closely to their previous responses than to demographic variables. A common Markov model for subject responses is shown to be inferior to other models in terms of predictive power. Methods considered are shown to apply to cases in which censoring or nonresponse problems exist.

笔记与分组