Efficiency Lost By Analyzing Counts Rather Than Event Times in Poisson and Overdispersed Poisson Regression Models
泊松及过度离散泊松回归中用计数替代事件时点的效率损失AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以实验或试验中的治疗效应比较为应用目标,直接关联效应推断,但主要贡献是数据聚合的效率分析。
泊松及过度离散泊松回归中用计数替代事件时点的效率损失AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Inference for point processes is most efficient if the event times for each individual are available. Sometimes, the study design is such that only aggregated data are collected, consisting of the number of events or recurrences for each individual over the observation period. This article discusses the loss in efficiency of an analysis of the aggregated counts versus an analysis of the actual event times. One particular case is exemplified—that in which the purpose of the experiment or trial is to compare the effects of treatments—and the loss in efficiency in the estimator of the treatment effect is computed. The specific point process considered here is the nonhomogeneous Poisson process, with a proportional intensity model for the treatment effects. Random-effects models are also considered, with estimation via a quasi-likelihood approach. The quasi-likelihood analysis proposed here is an extension of such techniques for the homogeneous Poisson process. The resulting estimating equations for the parameters in the random-effects models are simple and intuitive. The results show that for many usual situations, treatment effects are very efficiently estimated using aggregated data, but the underlying intensity function is not.