跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确针对条件风险价值、条件预期损失和上下行尾部风险构建同时置信带,最直接对应尾部与系统性风险方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shuo Li
Liuhua Peng
Xiaojun Song

条件风险价值与条件预期损失的同时置信带

研究问题
如何为条件风险价值和条件预期损失构造跨尾部水平同时有效的置信带,并处理单侧尾部及上下行风险比率?
方法与思路
作者用重尾创新的位置尺度模型过滤收益动态,再借助极值理论估计尾部风险,区分极端与中间情形并设计 bootstrap。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称置信带对一组尾部水平统一有效,涵盖超出样本范围的外推与样本内尾部推断,所提 bootstrap 获得模拟支持。
阅读关注点
应核对尾部假设、阈值选择、尾部水平集合及统一覆盖的定义,并检查极端外推条件与 bootstrap 对动态估计误差的处理。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要版本,无法确定尾部条件、置信带宽度或覆盖率数值,极端外推的可靠性仍取决于全文中的假设。

原文摘要

Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) and conditional expected shortfall (CES) are widely adopted risk measures which help monitor potential tail risk while adapting to evolving market information. In this paper, we propose an approach to constructing simultaneous confidence bands (SCBs) for tail risk as measured by CVaR and CES, with the confidence bands uniformly valid for a set of tail levels. We consider one-sided tail risk (downside or upside tail risk) as well as relative tail risk (the ratio of upside to downside tail risk). A general class of location-scale models with heavy-tailed innovations is employed to filter out the return dynamics. Then, CVaR and CES are estimated with the aid of extreme value theory. In the asymptotic theory, we consider two scenarios: (i) the extreme scenario that allows for extrapolation beyond the range of the available data and (ii) the intermediate scenario that works exclusively in the case where the available data are adequate relative to the tail level. For finite-sample implementation, we propose a novel bootstrap procedure to circumvent the slow convergence rates of the SCBs as well as infeasibility of approximating the limiting distributions. A series of Monte Carlo simulations confirm that our approach works well in finite samples.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文