跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究种群遗传学模型的识别,不能据一般识别术语归入因果推断或其他所列方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Anand Bhaskar
Yun S. Song

笛卡尔符号法则与基因组变异数据中种群历史模型的可识别性

研究问题
不同种群规模历史可能生成相同样本频率谱时,对规模函数施加生物学相关的分段限制,能否恢复模型的唯一识别?
方法与思路
作者将种群规模限制为指定函数族组成的分段函数,利用推广至拉普拉斯变换的笛卡尔符号法则分析期望频率谱。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称足够大的样本可使期望频率谱唯一确定所述模型,并给出依赖分段数与函数类型的样本量界及折叠频率谱结果。
阅读关注点
应核对各分段函数族的限制、唯一识别的具体含义、样本量界的充分性,以及期望频率谱结论与实际估计之间的区别。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;未给出样本量界公式或有限数据推断结果,理论可识别性不等于实际估计精确。

原文摘要

The sample frequency spectrum (SFS) is a widely-used summary statistic of genomic variation in a sample of homologous DNA sequences. It provides a highly efficient dimensional reduction of large-scale population genomic data and its mathematical dependence on the underlying population demography is well understood, thus enabling the development of efficient inference algorithms. However, it has been recently shown that very different population demographies can actually generate the same SFS for arbitrarily large sample sizes. Although in principle this nonidentifiability issue poses a thorny challenge to statistical inference, the population size functions involved in the counterexamples are arguably not so biologically realistic. Here, we revisit this problem and examine the identifiability of demographic models under the restriction that the population sizes are piecewise-defined where each piece belongs to some family of biologically-motivated functions. Under this assumption, we prove that the expected SFS of a sample uniquely determines the underlying demographic model, provided that the sample is sufficiently large. We obtain a general bound on the sample size sufficient for identifiability; the bound depends on the number of pieces in the demographic model and also on the type of population size function in each piece. In the cases of piecewise-constant, piecewise-exponential and piecewise-generalized-exponential models, which are often assumed in population genomic inferences, we provide explicit formulas for the bounds as simple functions of the number of pieces. Lastly, we obtain analogous results for the “folded” SFS, which is often used when there is ambiguity as to which allelic type is ancestral. Our results are proved using a generalization of Descartes’ rule of signs for polynomials to the Laplace transform of piecewise continuous functions.

笔记与分组