跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般回归模型平均理论,未明确时间序列、宏观预测或收益预测应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Alan T.K. Wan
Xinyu Zhang
Guohua Zou

基于 Mallows 准则的最小二乘模型平均

研究问题
Mallows 准则模型平均的渐近最优性,是否可以摆脱候选模型严格嵌套及权重限于特殊离散集合的要求?
方法与思路
作者提供替代证明,将候选模型扩展为允许回归变量任意线性组合的非嵌套设定,并允许连续模型权重。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称 Mallows 准则的最优性在连续权重与非嵌套模型下仍成立,从而扩展既有结论的适用范围。
阅读关注点
应核对候选模型规模、连续权重的可行域、误差条件和渐近风险定义,确认放宽两项限制后仍保留哪些要求。
阅读边界
所列出版社摘要未给出完整正则条件或有限样本证据;渐近平方误差最优性不能直接等同于任意预测任务中的优势。

原文摘要

This paper is in response to a recent paper by Hansen (2007) who proposed an optimal model average estimator with weights selected by minimizing a Mallows criterion. The main contribution of Hansen's paper is a demonstration that the Mallows criterion is asymptotically equivalent to the squared error, so the model average estimator that minimizes the Mallows criterion also minimizes the squared error in large samples. We are concerned with two assumptions that accompany Hansen's approach. The first is the assumption that the approximating models are strictly nested in a way that depends on the ordering of regressors. Often there is no clear basis for the ordering and the approach does not permit non-nested models which are more realistic from a practical viewpoint. Second, for the optimality result to hold the model weights are required to lie within a special discrete set. In fact, Hansen noted both difficulties and called for extensions of the proof techniques. We provide an alternative proof which shows that the result on the optimality of the Mallows criterion in fact holds for continuous model weights and under a non-nested set-up that allows any linear combination of regressors in the approximating models that make up the model average estimator. These results provide a stronger theoretical basis for the use of the Mallows criterion in model averaging by strengthening existing findings.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文