跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究生存模型变量选择,未明确涉及处理效应、结构估计或其他所列细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqing Fan
Runze Li

Cox 比例风险模型与脆弱性模型的变量选择

研究问题
如何将非凹惩罚似然用于 Cox 比例风险及脆弱性模型的变量选择,并在合适调参下兼顾估计精度与模型简化?
方法与思路
作者把非凹惩罚似然扩展到两类半参数生存模型,分析正则化参数与收敛速度的关系,并推导标准误公式和开展模拟。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称适当选择惩罚与参数可获得 oracle 性质;模拟中,相对最佳子集法和 LASSO 的若干性能指标有所改善。
阅读关注点
应核对删失和脆弱性结构的假设、oracle 性质所需条件、调参规则,以及标准误准确性和模拟比较的具体指标。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;未提供条件、数值或比较设置,oracle 性质是条件性声明,不能据此判定普遍优于其他方法。

原文摘要

A class of variable selection procedures for parametric models via nonconcave penalized likelihood was proposed in Fan and Li (2001a). It has been shown there that the resulting procedures perform as well as if the subset of significant variables were known in advance. Such a property is called an oracle property. The proposed procedures were illustrated in the context of linear regression, robust linear regression and generalized linear models. In this paper, the nonconcave penalized likelihood approach is extended further to the Cox proportional hazards model and the Cox proportional hazards frailty model, two commonly used semi-parametric models in survival analysis. As a result, new variable selection procedures for these two commonly-used models are proposed. It is demonstrated how the rates of convergence depend on the regularization parameter in the penalty function. Further, with a proper choice of the regularization parameter and the penalty function, the proposed estimators possess an oracle property. Standard error formulae are derived and their accuracies are empirically tested. Simulation studies show that the proposed procedures are more stable in prediction and more effective in computation than the best subset variable selection, and they reduce model complexity as effectively as the best subset variable selection. Compared with the LASSO, which is the penalized likelihood method with the $L_1$ -penalty, proposed by Tibshirani, the newly proposed approaches have better theoretic properties and finite sample performance.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文