跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于通用线性回归模型平均,未指定时间序列、收益预测或其他所列细分领域的研究对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Adrian E. Raftery
David Madigan

线性回归模型的贝叶斯模型平均

研究问题
在线性回归存在预测变量选择不确定性时,如何避免仅条件于单个模型而低估不确定性,并可行地近似跨模型推断?
方法与思路
作者提出以 Occam's window 筛选少量模型后平均,以及通过 Markov chain Monte Carlo 直接近似完整模型平均两种方案。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,两种方案在所讨论的模型不确定性情形中改善预测表现;无信号情形下,模型窗口通常保留空模型或少量模型。
阅读关注点
核对模型与参数先验、模型窗口筛选规则、链的收敛诊断,以及预测优势和无信号变量选择结论对应的实验设置。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 摘要,来源未标明稿件版本,无法推断刊本变化;预测优势不能据此推广到任意数据,所述软件当前状态也未核验。

原文摘要

We consider the problem of accounting for model uncertainty in linear regression models. Conditioning on a single selected model ignores model uncertainty, and thus leads to the underestimation of uncertainty when making inferences about quantities of interest. A Bayesian solution to this problem involves averaging over all possible models (i.e., combinations of predictors) when making inferences about quantities of interest. This approach is often not practical. In this article we offer two alternative approaches. First, we describe an ad hoc procedure, “Occam's window,” which indicates a small set of models over which a model average can be computed. Second, we describe a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach that directly approximates the exact solution. In the presence of model uncertainty, both of these model averaging procedures provide better predictive performance than any single model that might reasonably have been selected. In the extreme case where there are many candidate predictors but no relationship between any of them and the response, standard variable selection procedures often choose some subset of variables that yields a high R 2 and a highly significant overall F value. In this situation, Occam's window usually indicates the null model (or a small number of models including the null model) as the only one (or ones) to be considered thus largely resolving the problem of selecting significant models when there is no signal in the data. Software to implement our methods is available from StatLib.

笔记与分组