跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦通用多重检验及脑成像分组应用,未提供归入所列微观、宏观或金融细分方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Rina Foygel Barber
Aaditya Ramdas

p-filter:分组假设的多层错误发现率控制

研究问题
当同一组假设存在多种分组方式时,如何同时控制各分组层面的错误发现率,并将已有结构信息纳入多重检验?
方法与思路
作者提出 p-filter,以各假设的 p 值和多种分组划分为输入筛选发现,允许非层级划分,并通过模拟和脑成像应用展示。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法可同时控制各划分的组错误发现率,特定划分下恢复 Benjamini–Hochberg 程序或 Simes 检验。
阅读关注点
应核对 p 值有效性、依赖条件、组发现的定义及筛选算法,并检查模拟中拒绝精确度改善与检验功效之间的关系。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,控制保证所需的依赖条件及模拟数值未说明;不能据此认定任意依赖下有效或全面优于其他程序。

原文摘要

Summary In many practical applications of multiple testing, there are natural ways to partition the hypotheses into groups by using the structural, spatial or temporal relatedness of the hypotheses, and this prior knowledge is not used in the classical Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR). When one can define (possibly several) such partitions, it may be desirable to control the group FDR simultaneously for all partitions (as special cases, the ‘finest’ partition divides the n hypotheses into n groups of one hypothesis each, and this corresponds to controlling the usual notion of FDR, whereas the ‘coarsest’ partition puts all n hypotheses into a single group, and this corresponds to testing the global null hypothesis). We introduce the p-filter, which takes as input a list of n p-values and M ⩾ 1 partitions of hypotheses, and produces as output a list of n or fewer discoveries such that the group FDR is provably simultaneously controlled for all partitions. Importantly, since the partitions are arbitrary, our procedure can also handle multiple partitions which are non-hierarchical. The p-filter generalizes two classical procedures—when M = 1, choosing the finest partition into n singletons, we exactly recover the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, whereas, choosing instead the coarsest partition with a single group of size n, we exactly recover the Simes test for the global null hypothesis. We verify our findings with simulations that show how this technique can not only lead to the aforementioned multilayer FDR control but also lead to improved precision of rejected hypotheses. We present some illustrative results from an application to a neuroscience problem with functional magnetic resonance imaging data, where hypotheses are explicitly grouped according to predefined regions of interest in the brain, thus allowing the scientist to employ field-specific prior knowledge explicitly and flexibly.

笔记与分组