← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
分类依据题名和摘要中的方法词与领域语境，不使用期刊名称猜测研究方向。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
原文摘要
We study online conformal prediction in a partially observed panel: a new cross-section of peer outcomes is observed before each target outcome, target feedback may be intermittent or absent, and neither units nor rounds need be exchangeable. We propose Weighted Temporal Quantile Adjustment (W-TQA), which combines similarity weights learned from unit histories with an adaptive target-specific miscoverage level. We prove that neither target-peer mismatch nor coverage on unrevealed rounds is identifiable, so assumptions on cross-unit similarity and on the feedback mechanism cannot be avoided. We bound the past-conditional miscoverage in terms of this mismatch, quantify the cost of learning the weights under a profile-similarity assumption, and show that the implemented procedure, which falls back on the largest peer score, attains long-run average coverage under missing-completely-at-random feedback and a feasibility condition on the calibration panel. On synthetic panels and four real panels, including a genuinely asynchronous U.S.-to-Tokyo equity panel, W-TQA attains the highest coverage on the worst-covered target units on every panel; similarity weighting contributes most when target feedback is scarce, and temporal adaptation more as feedback accumulates.