跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用多元 probit 联合建模五项二元服务利用指标,直接对应离散选择与多响应建模。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

医疗服务利用与保险覆盖:多元 probit 分析

研究问题
在 Medicare 老年人样本中,补充保险类型与五类医疗服务利用如何相关,怎样联合考虑协变量和服务之间的相关性?
方法与思路
作者对 4658 名老年人的五项服务使用指标拟合多元 probit,控制人口与健康协变量,并进行考虑响应相关性的联合检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称主要贡献是利用五项服务数据实施单一保险效应检验,同时给出在保险与人口特征条件下特定服务组合的概率。
阅读关注点
应核对多元 probit 的计算实现、响应相关结构、联合检验构造,以及保险选择和健康状态如何限制系数解释。
阅读边界
材料为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要。摘要描述的是保险与利用的条件关联,未提供因果识别策略,不能将保险系数直接解释为因果效应。

原文摘要

A computationally practical form of probit analysis for multiple response variables was applied to data on health service utilization as it relates to type of supplemental insurance coverage and other demographic covariates in a sample of 4,658 individuals over age 65 on Medicare. The quantal response variables comprised use of five health services: Medical provider visit, hospital outpatient visit, emergency room visit, hospital inpatient stay, and home health care visit. An individual could use any or all of these services. Supplemental insurance coverage was categorized as Medicaid, employer-related private insurance, and privately purchased insurance, and any combination of these insurance coverages was possible. Covariates included health status, education, urban location, race, sex, marital status, employment status, age, and income. The multivariate probit model estimates association between insurance coverage variables and health service utilization patterns jointly for the five health service variables while controlling for the effects of the covariates and correlation among the health service utilization variables. The estimated correlation among the five health service utilization variables is then taken into account when testing the hypothesis of no insurance coverage effects, providing an advance over traditional approaches such as univariate logistic regression. Data from all five service utilization variables are used to perform a single test of insurance coverage effects taking into account their intercorrelation and effects of covariates—the major contribution of this article. In addition, the multivariate probit model provides probability estimates for specific patterns of service use conditional on type of insurance coverage and demographic factors.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文