Bayesian Inference on Network Traffic Using Link Count Data
利用链路计数数据进行网络流量的贝叶斯推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究网络节点、链路约束及路径选择下的流量推断,对应网络方向,但未讨论处理干扰。
利用链路计数数据进行网络流量的贝叶斯推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study Bayesian models and methods for analysing network traffic counts in problems of inference about the traffic intensity between directed pairs of origins and destinations in networks. This is a class of problems very recently discussed by Vardi in a 1996 JASA article and is of interest in both communication and transportation network studies. The current article develops the theoretical framework of variants of the origin-destination flow problem and introduces Bayesian approaches to analysis and inference. In the first, the so-called fixed routing problem, traffic or messages pass between nodes in a network, with each message originating at a specific source node, and ultimately moving through the network to a predetermined destination node. All nodes are candidate origin and destination points. The framework assumes no travel time complications, considering only the number of messages passing between pairs of nodes in a specified time interval. The route count, or route flow, problem is to infer the set of actual number of messages passed between each directed origin-destination pair in the time interval, based on the observed counts flowing between all directed pairs of adjacent nodes. Based on some development of the theoretical structure of the problem and assumptions about prior distributional forms, we develop posterior distributions for inference on actual origin-destination counts and associated flow rates. This involves iterative simulation methods, or Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), that combine Metropolis–Hastings steps within an overall Gibbs sampling framework. We discuss issues of convergence and related practical matters, and illustrate the approach in a network previously studied in Vardi's article. We explore both methodological and applied aspects much further in a concrete problem of a road network in North Carolina, studied in transportation flow assessment contexts by civil engineers. This investigation generates critical insight into limitations of statistical analysis, and particularly of non-Bayesian approaches, due to inherent structural features of the problem. A truly Bayesian approach, imposing partial stochastic constraints through informed prior distributions, offers a way of resolving these problems and is consistent with prevailing trends in updating traffic flow intensities in this field. Following this, we explore a second version of the problem that introduces elements of uncertainty about routes taken by individual messages in terms of Markov selection of outgoing links for messages at any given node. For specified route choice probabilities, we introduce the concept of a super-network—namely, a fixed routing problem in which the stochastic problem may be embedded. This leads to solution of the stochastic version of the problem using the methods developed for the original formulation of the fixed routing problem. This is also illustrated. Finally, we discuss various related issues and model extensions, including inference on stochastic route choice selection probabilities, questions of missing data and partially observed link counts, and relationships with current research on road traffic network problems in which travel times within links are nonnegligible and may be estimated from additional data.