Asymptotics of CoVaR inference in two-quantile-regression
两步分位数回归中 CoVaR 推断的渐近理论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接围绕系统损失的条件分位数、CoVaR 与金融机构系统性风险推断。
两步分位数回归中 CoVaR 推断的渐近理论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Measuring systemic risk has been an important topic in recent research on risk management. Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016) pioneered the CoVaR measure for systemic risk, which is defined as the conditional quantile of system loss given some state predictors and one stress event of an individual loss at a certain risk level. They proposed to estimate CoVaR by a two-quantile-regression approach, which is simple and easy to implement in practice, but without stating or developing the necessary asymptotic theory. In this paper, we develop tests to reveal that using the classical regularity condition in quantile regressions for the two-quantile-regression model may be unrealistic by revisiting the datasets in Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016). Under the proposed weaker conditions, we further develop the asymptotic theory of the CoVaR inference and introduce a random weighted bootstrap method to quantify the inference uncertainty. We examine the finite sample performance of the proposed tests in terms of size and power, as well as the coverage probabilities of confidence intervals for CoVaR. Finally, we demonstrate the CoVaR inference across financial institutions and time.