跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论临床试验目标估计量、因果推断方法及疫情干扰后的效应估计。

反馈分类问题

Estimands and their Estimators for Clinical Trials Impacted by the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Report from the NISS Ingram Olkin Forum Series on Unplanned Clinical Trial Disruptions

受新冠疫情影响的临床试验:目标估计量及其估计方法

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kelly Van Lancker
Sergey Tarima
Jonathan Bartlett
Madeline Bauer
Frank Bretz
Nancy Flournoy
Hege Michiels
Suzie Cro

受新冠疫情影响的临床试验:目标估计量及其估计方法

研究问题
疫情造成试验中断、感染和测量缺失后,如何重新明确临床研究的目标估计量,并选择与研究目的匹配的估计方法?
方法与思路
作者依托 ICH E9(R1) 框架提出假想的目标估计量策略,讨论因果推断、缺失数据及结合无偏与可能有偏估计的方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称通过一个示例性试验说明疫情干扰如何改变目标估计量及估计方法,并提出未来试验应对意外中断的设计考虑。
阅读关注点
应核对不同中间事件对应的处理策略、目标估计量如何变化,以及因果推断和缺失数据方法分别依赖哪些识别条件。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未核验;摘要主要描述框架与假想试验,未提供具体方法的效果比较或适用条件。

原文摘要

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect the conduct of clinical trials globally. Complications may arise from pandemic-related operational challenges such as site closures, travel limitations and interruptions to the supply chain for the investigational product, or from health-related challenges such as COVID-19 infections. Some of these complications lead to unforeseen intercurrent events in the sense that they affect either the interpretation or the existence of the measurements associated with the clinical question of interest. In this article, we demonstrate how the ICH E9(R1) Addendum on estimands and sensitivity analyses provides a rigorous basis to discuss potential pandemic-related trial disruptions and to embed these disruptions in the context of study objectives and design elements. We introduce several hypothetical estimand strategies and review various causal inference and missing data methods, as well as a statistical method that combines unbiased and possibly biased estimators for estimation. To illustrate, we describe the features of a stylized trial, and how it may have been impacted by the pandemic. This stylized trial will then be re-visited by discussing the changes to the estimand and the estimator to account for pandemic disruptions. Finally, we outline considerations for designing future trials in the context of unforeseen disruptions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文