跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究保险组合选择、潜在偏好与考虑集的结构模型,并通过模型估计进行福利反事实分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Levon Barseghyan
Francesca Molinari

风险偏好类型、有限考虑与福利

研究问题
当家庭跨险种购买保险组合时,如何同时识别不同风险偏好类型及其参数分布,并评估有限考虑如何影响市场干预的福利效果?
方法与思路
作者构建两类偏好的混合模型,分别采用常绝对风险厌恶期望效用与风险选择对偶理论,并利用跨情境协变量变化识别组合层面的考虑集异质性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称给出半非参数点识别的充分条件,允许两类偏好参数的分布不受参数化限制,并用家庭免赔额选择评估合并险种的假想干预。
阅读关注点
应核对跨情境协变量变化需要满足什么条件、偏好与考虑集如何区分,以及假想险种合并中的选择行为和福利计算如何设定。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 OpenAlex 版本摘要;识别条件、考虑集形成机制及福利结果数值未说明,不能据此推断刊本修改或干预的一般效果。

原文摘要

We provide sufficient conditions for semi-nonparametric point identification of a mixture model of decision making under risk, when agents make choices in multiple lines of insurance coverage (contexts) by purchasing a bundle. As a first departure from the related literature, the model allows for two preference types. In the first one, agents behave according to standard expected utility theory with CARA Bernoulli utility function, with an agent-specific coefficient of absolute risk aversion whose distribution is left completely unspecified. In the other, agents behave according to the dual theory of choice under risk combined with a one-parameter family distortion function, where the parameter is agent-specific and is drawn from a distribution that is left completely unspecified. Within each preference type, the model allows for unobserved heterogeneity in consideration sets, where the latter form at the bundle level—a second departure from the related literature. Our point identification result rests on observing sufficient variation in covariates across contexts, without requiring any independent variation across alternatives within a single context. We estimate the model on data on households’ deductible choices in two lines of property insurance, and use the results to assess the welfare implications of a hypothetical market intervention where the two lines of insurance are combined into a single one. We study the role of limited consideration in mediating the welfare effects of such intervention.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文