Test for independence of long-range dependent time series using distance covariance
基于距离协方差的长记忆时间序列独立性检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究长程依赖时间序列的独立性检验、极限分布和子抽样,时间序列方法的文本依据明确。
基于距离协方差的长记忆时间序列独立性检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We apply the concept of distance covariance for testing independence of two long-range dependent time series. As test statistic we propose a linear combination of empirical distance cross-covariances. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic, and we show consistency against a very general class of alternatives. The asymptotic theory developed in this paper is based on a novel non-central limit theorem for stochastic processes with values in an $L^2$-Hilbert space. This limit theorem is of general theoretical interest which goes beyond the context of this article. Subject to the dependence in the data, the standardization and the limit distributions of the proposed test statistic vary. Since the limit distributions are unknown, we propose a subsampling procedure to determine the critical values for the proposed test, and we provide a proof for the validity of subsampling. In a simulation study, we investigate the finite-sample behavior of our test, and we compare its performance to tests based on the empirical cross-covariances. As an application of our results we analyze the cross-dependencies between mean monthly discharges of three rivers.