跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要是基因表达数据的统计分类研究,没有经济离散选择或其他所列计量经济学细分方向的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Bani K. Mallick
Debashis Ghosh
Malay Ghosh

利用基因表达数据进行肿瘤的贝叶斯分类

研究问题
面对传统组织形态难以区分的肿瘤,如何利用数千个基因的表达模式进行分类,并比较不同贝叶斯分类方法?
方法与思路
作者在再生核希尔伯特空间中构造贝叶斯分类方法,比较逻辑似然与支持向量机相关似然及不同收缩参数配置。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,模拟和例子中,多收缩参数的支持向量机模型比若干经典方法、贝叶斯逻辑模型及单收缩参数模型误分类更少。
阅读关注点
核对核函数、收缩先验和超参数处理,以及训练测试划分、基准调参方式和误分类比较是否具有统计不确定性评价。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要。误分类差距、样本规模和验证设计未说明,不能据此确认临床诊断效益或普遍优势。

原文摘要

Summary Precise classification of tumours is critical for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Diagnostic pathology has traditionally relied on macroscopic and microscopic histology and tumour morphology as the basis for the classification of tumours. Current classification frameworks, however, cannot discriminate between tumours with similar histopathologic features, which vary in clinical course and in response to treatment. In recent years, there has been a move towards the use of complementary deoxyribonucleic acid microarrays for the classi-fication of tumours. These high throughput assays provide relative messenger ribonucleic acid expression measurements simultaneously for thousands of genes. A key statistical task is to perform classification via different expression patterns. Gene expression profiles may offer more information than classical morphology and may provide an alternative to classical tumour diagnosis schemes. The paper considers several Bayesian classification methods based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces for the analysis of microarray data. We consider the logistic likelihood as well as likelihoods related to support vector machine models. It is shown through simulation and examples that support vector machine models with multiple shrinkage parameters produce fewer misclassification errors than several existing classical methods as well as Bayesian methods based on the logistic likelihood or those involving only one shrinkage parameter.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文