跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确涉及处理与对照匹配、未观测混杂及处理效应敏感性分析,属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Abba M. Krieger
Paul R. Rosenbaum

敏感性分析中的渐近可分性

研究问题
在一名处理对象匹配多个对照的观察性研究中,如何计算未观测混杂下的敏感性界限,并简化跨匹配组的联合优化?
方法与思路
作者研究秩检验敏感性界限的优化问题,证明在匹配组较多时可逐组优化,再合并结果近似整体最优值。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称对两类秩检验建立渐近可分性,提供相关估计和置信区间,并以数值计算及高中辍学研究展示方法。
阅读关注点
应核对隐藏偏差模型、渐近可分性的误差控制、适用检验与匹配结构,以及数值近似表现能否覆盖具体应用。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;少量匹配组下表现良好属于所述数值证据,不能保证任意样本中的近似精度。

原文摘要

Summary In an observational study in which each treated subject is matched to several untreated controls by using observed pretreatment covariates, a sensitivity analysis asks how hidden biases due to unobserved covariates might alter the conclusions. The bounds required for a sensitivity analysis are the solution to an optimization problem. In general, this optimization problem is not separable, in the sense that one cannot find the needed optimum by performing a separate optimization in each matched set and combining the results. We show, however, that this optimization problem is asymptotically separable, so that when there are many matched sets a separate optimization may be performed in each matched set and the results combined to yield the correct optimum with negligible error. This is true when the Wilcoxon rank sum test or the Hodges-Lehmann aligned rank test is applied in matching with multiple controls. Numerical calculations show that the asymptotic approximation performs well with as few as 10 matched sets. In the case of the rank sum test, a table is given containing the separable solution. With this table, only simple arithmetic is required to conduct the sensitivity analysis. The method also supplies estimates, such as the Hodges-Lehmann estimate, and confidence intervals associated with rank tests. The method is illustrated in a study of dropping out of US high schools and the effects on cognitive test scores.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文