跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究平行趋势违背下的双重差分、处理组平均效应部分识别及其推断,属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ting Ye
Luke Keele
Raiden Hasegawa
Dylan S. Small

双重差分中构造效应界限的负相关策略

研究问题
当处理组与对照组不满足平行趋势时,能否利用两组对照单位约束处理组平均处理效应,并为所得识别集合构造有效区间?
方法与思路
作者利用两组对照相对处理组的结果负相关关系进行部分识别,并针对含最小、最大算子的联合界限结构设计自助法推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该策略给出处理组平均效应的识别界限与渐近有效区间,同时提供证伪检验和敏感性分析,并应用于最低工资与就业。
阅读关注点
应核对负相关识别条件的准确对象及经济含义、两组对照的选择依据,以及新自助法怎样处理非光滑界限和覆盖率问题。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;识别条件的具体形式和最低工资应用结果未提供,不能把一般负相关直接视为有效识别条件。

原文摘要

The method of difference-in-differences (DID) is widely used to study the causal effect of policy interventions in observational studies. DID employs a before and after comparison of the treated and control units to remove bias due to time-invariant unmeasured confounders under the parallel trends assumption. Estimates from DID, however, will be biased if the outcomes for the treated and control units evolve differently in the absence of treatment, namely if the parallel trends assumption is violated. We propose a general identification strategy that leverages two groups of control units whose outcomes relative to the treated units exhibit a negative correlation, and achieves partial identification of the average treatment effect for the treated. The identified set is of a union bounds form that involves the minimum and maximum operators, which makes the canonical bootstrap generally inconsistent and naive methods overly conservative. By using the directional inconsistency of the bootstrap distribution, we develop a novel bootstrap method to construct confidence intervals for the identified set and parameter of interest when the identified set is of a union bounds form, and we theoretically establish the asymptotic validity of the proposed method. We develop a simple falsification test and sensitivity analysis. We apply the proposed strategy for bracketing to study whether minimum wage laws affect employment levels. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文