Estimation of spillover effects with matched data or longitudinal network data
利用匹配数据或纵向网络数据估计溢出效应AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕社会网络溢出与同伴效应,利用个体跨期关系变化处理选择和共同冲击问题。
利用匹配数据或纵向网络数据估计溢出效应AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Social interactions often play a key role in determining the impact of policies, but measuring the magnitude of spillover effects empirically is notoriously challenging because, in most applications, a person’s relationships are likely to reflect her own characteristics (homophily), and people who are connected are likely to be affected by the same shocks (common factors). In addition, a significant share of social interactions is likely to occur through variables that are not observed by the researcher. When matched data are used, observations corresponding to the same cross-sectional units (e.g., workers or students) can be linked over time, and a cross-sectional unit’s relationships (e.g., co-workers or classmates) are indexed in each time period. We show that comparisons over time in the outcomes of individuals whose relationships changed can be used to measure the importance of social interactions in the presence of flexible patterns of selection on unobservables and common factors, even if social interactions only occur through unobservables. We apply our results to estimate the importance of peer effects in student learning in elementary school.