Yongmiao Hong, Oliver Linton, Jiajing Sun, and Meiting Zhu’s contribution to the Discussion of ‘the Discussion Meeting on Probabilistic and statistical aspects of machine learning’
洪永淼、Oliver Linton、孙佳静与朱美婷对机器学习概率与统计讨论会的评论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:评论明确讨论时间序列变点检测、序列依赖以及相关金融序列中的结构变化问题。
洪永淼、Oliver Linton、孙佳静与朱美婷对机器学习概率与统计讨论会的评论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper proposes a neural network-based approach for automating offline change-point detection. The authors show that cumulative sum (CUSUM) and generalized CUSUM are a special case of their neural network class. They emphasize misclassification error rates and their theoretical contribution is to establish some elegant results for these under i.i.d. unit variance Gaussian data with a possible change in mean. Their theoretical results outline the conditions on the empirical risk minimization neural network that allow it to achieve comparable performance to the classic CUSUM test for this very specific setting. The framework relies on N training data samples that are independent and identical copies where N≫n2logn, which seems like a lot of training is needed! The CUSUM test only needs the sample of size n. In many financial applications, we have a single time series {X1,…,Xn} and we are interested in when and how change points occur throughout the whole observation period. It is not clear how or why we should divide the data into training and testing samples and some guidance on this would be appreciated. In those applications, considerable care needs to be taken in how to account for time series dependence and where this is treated non-parametrically issues arise with bandwidth selection. The self-normalization method proposed by Shao (2010) does not require the choice of tuning parameter and so is also automatic, and is quite widely used for identifying change points within a given dataset (Shao & Zhang, 2010). However, this method is known to have poor power properties. Recently, Hong et al. (2024) proposed the adjusted-range-based self-normalization, instead of the usual long-run variance normalization, and this appears to work better under some long memory alternatives. The current paper avoids the normalization issue altogether by making use of training data, and perhaps where that exists their method can have advantages, but it would be interesting to know how competitive their method is on financial time series and on realistic sampling schemes with longer range dependence. The research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grants No. 71988101 and No. 72173120.