跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究高维关联筛选和方向性多重检验,未建立因果解释或所列其他经济计量应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

用于高维选择后推断的knockoff过滤器

研究问题
在线性模型的变量数可能远超观测数时,如何先筛选变量,再对缩减模型中的关联及其符号进行错误发现率控制?
方法与思路
作者将观测分为筛选组和推断组,对筛选变量构造knockoff对照变量,并设计在推断阶段利用首组信息提高功效的策略。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该程序在缩减模型中非渐近控制方向性FDR;数值研究显示比所比较方法功效更高,并用于全基因组关联研究。
阅读关注点
应核对筛选集规模、缩减模型系数的含义、模型与误差条件,以及首组信息如何进入推断而保持方向性FDR控制。
阅读边界
仅依据版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要;关联符号不等于因果效应,摘要未说明全部模型条件,功效优势仅限所报告比较。

原文摘要

This paper develops a framework for testing for associations in a possibly high-dimensional linear model where the number of features/variables may far exceed the number of observational units. In this framework, the observations are split into two groups, where the first group is used to screen for a set of potentially relevant variables, whereas the second is used for inference over this reduced set of variables; we also develop strategies for leveraging information from the first part of the data at the inference step for greater power. In our work, the inferential step is carried out by applying the recently introduced knockoff filter, which creates a knockoff copy—a fake variable serving as a control—for each screened variable. We prove that this procedure controls the directional false discovery rate (FDR) in the reduced model controlling for all screened variables; this says that our high-dimensional knockoff procedure “discovers” important variables as well as the directions (signs) of their effects, in such a way that the expected proportion of wrongly chosen signs is below the user-specified level (thereby controlling a notion of Type S error averaged over the selected set). This result is nonasymptotic, and holds for any distribution of the original features and any values of the unknown regression coefficients, so that inference is not calibrated under hypothesized values of the effect sizes. We demonstrate the performance of our general and flexible approach through numerical studies, showing more power than existing alternatives. Finally, we apply our method to a genome-wide association study to find locations on the genome that are possibly associated with a continuous phenotype.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文