Testing Causality between Two Vectors in Multivariate Autoregressive Moving Average Models
多元ARMA模型中两个变量向量之间的因果性检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究经济时间序列中的多元ARMA与Granger非因果性检验。
多元ARMA模型中两个变量向量之间的因果性检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In the analysis of economic time series, a question often raised is whether a vector of variables causes another one in the sense of Granger. Most of the literature on this topic is concerned with bivariate relationships or uses finite-order autoregressive specifications. The purpose of this article is to develop a causality analysis in the sense of Granger for general vector autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models. We give a definition of Granger noncausality between vectors, which is a natural and simple extension of the notion of Granger noncausality between two variables. In our context, this definition is shown to be equivalent to a more complex definition proposed by Tjostheim. For the class of linear invertible processes, we derive a necessary and sufficient condition for noncausality between two vectors of variables when the latter do not necessarily include all the variables considered in the analysis. This result is then specialized to the class of stationary invertible ARMA processes. Further, relatively simple necessary and sufficient conditions are obtained for two important cases: (1) the case where the two vectors reduce to two variables inside a larger vector including other variables; and (2) the case where the two vectors embody all the variables considered. Test procedures for these necessary and sufficient conditions are discussed. Among other things, it is noted that the necessary and sufficient conditions for noncausality may involve singularities at which standard asymptotic regularity conditions do not hold. To deal with such situations, we propose a sequential approach that leads to bounds tests. Finally, the tests suggested are applied to Canadian money and income data. The tests are based on bivariate and trivariate models of changes in nominal income and two money stocks (M1 and M2). In contrast with the evidence based on bivariate models, we find from the trivariate model that money causes income unidirectionally.