Statistical Comparison of Forecasts Made at Different Frequencies
不同频率预测的统计比较AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦经济预测评价,并处理不同频率时间序列的时间相关与交叉相关。
不同频率预测的统计比较AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Current forecast evaluation tests can only assess forecasts generated at the same frequency. However, in real-world scenarios, predictions for the same economic variable may be made at different frequencies. The existing literature lacks statistical tests for evaluating such forecasts. This paper introduces a new evaluation test for comparing these forecasts. We propose a two-sample t-type test designed to test the equality of means between two potentially correlated time series that are sampled at different frequencies. No current estimator can compute the variance needed to studentize the difference in the sample means, given the potential temporal and cross-correlations, alongside the mixed-frequency nature of the related data. To address this, we propose a block-average-based variance estimator for this purpose. We derive the asymptotic null distribution of our new two-sample t statistic and analyze the test’s local power. Through extensive Monte Carlo simulations, our two-sample test demonstrates favorable size and power properties in finite samples. Notably, in cases with small sample sizes, our approach outperforms existing heuristic methods, which involve discarding data to align forecasts and applying conventional tests. Additionally, we uncover interesting connections with relevant methods in the literature.