Triplet Matching for Estimating Causal Effects With Three Treatment Arms: A Comparative Study of Mortality by Trauma Center Level
三治疗组因果效应的三元匹配:创伤中心等级与死亡率比较AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究观察数据中的多治疗组匹配、因果比较及未测量混杂敏感性分析。
三治疗组因果效应的三元匹配:创伤中心等级与死亡率比较AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Giovanni Nattinoa, Bo Lua*, Junxin Shib , Stanley Lemeshowa & Henry Xiangbca Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OHb Center for Pediatric Trauma Research, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OHc College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OHSupplementary materials for this article are available online. Please go to www.tandfonline.com/r/JASA.CONTACT Bo Lu lu.232@osu.edu Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.AbstractComparing outcomes across different levels of trauma centers is vital in evaluating regionalized trauma care. With observational data, it is critical to adjust for patient characteristics to render valid causal comparisons. Propensity score matching is a popular method to infer causal relationships in observational studies with two treatment arms. Few studies, however, have used matching designs with more than two groups, due to the complexity of matching algorithms. We fill the gap by developing an iterative matching algorithm for the three-group setting. Our algorithm outperforms the nearest neighbor algorithm and is shown to produce matched samples with total distance no larger than twice the optimal distance. We implement the evidence factors method for binary outcomes, which includes a randomization-based testing strategy and a sensitivity analysis for hidden bias in three-group matched designs. We apply our method to the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data to compare emergency department mortality among non-trauma, level I, and level II trauma centers. Our tests suggest that the admission to a trauma center has a beneficial effect on mortality, assuming no unmeasured confounding. A sensitivity analysis for hidden bias shows that unmeasured confounders, moderately associated with the type of care received, may change the result qualitatively. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.