A General Framework for Estimation and Inference From Clusters of Features
基于特征簇进行估计与推断的一般框架AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用特征分组与选择后推断,没有因果、面板或其他所列领域的直接依据。
基于特征簇进行估计与推断的一般框架AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Applied statistical problems often come with prespecified groupings to predictors. It is natural to test for the presence of simultaneous group-wide signal for groups in isolation, or for multiple groups together. Current tests for the presence of such signals include the classical F-test or a t-test on unsupervised group prototypes (either group centroids or first principal components). In this article, we propose test statistics that aim for power improvements over these classical approaches. In particular, we first create group prototypes, with reference to the response, and then test with likelihood ratio statistics incorporating only these prototypes. We propose a model, called the “prototype model,” which naturally models this two-step procedure. Furthermore, we introduce an inferential schema detailing the unique considerations for different combinations of prototype formation and univariate/multivariate testing models. The prototype model also suggests new applications to estimation and prediction. Prototype formation often relies on variable selection, which invalidates classical Gaussian test theory. We use recent advances in selective inference to account for selection in the prototyping step and retain test validity. Simulation experiments suggest that our testing procedure enjoys more power than do classical approaches. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.