跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦人口捕获再捕获与列联表模型,未直接对应所列经济计量细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
John N. Darroch
Gary F. V. Glonek
Brian W. Junker

捕获概率异质性下人口估计的三样本多重再捕获方法

研究问题
在人口漏计估计中,如何允许个体捕获概率不同,并利用新增数据来源分离普查与普查后调查间由异质性造成的依赖?
方法与思路
作者采用带个体参数的 Rasch 变体,引入第三个来源,以对数线性准对称模型估计可观测格,再外推全部漏捕格。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架提供分离异质性诱发依赖的机制,并给出观测格估计与未观测格外推方法,配有人口普查预演数据示例。
阅读关注点
应核对额外来源的独立性要求、Rasch 异质性结构、准对称模型,以及无二阶交互设定如何支撑漏捕格外推。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;列联表维度记号提取不清,需查原 PDF,外推假设及其稳健性仍须核对。

原文摘要

A central assumption in the standard capture-recapture approach to the estimation of the size of a closed population is the homogeneity of the “capture” probabilities. In this article we develop an approach that allows for varying susceptibility to capture through individual parameters using a variant of the Rasch model from psychological measurement situations. Our approach requires an additional recapture. In the context of census undercount estimation, this requirement amounts to the use of a second independent sample or alternative data source to be matched with census and Post-Enumeration Survey (PES) data. The models we develop provide a mechanism for separating out the dependence between census and PES induced by individual heterogeneity. The resulting data take the form of an incomplete 23 contingency table, and we describe how to estimate the expected values of the observable cells of this table using log-linear quasi-symmetry models. The projection of these estimates onto the unobserved cell corresponding to those individuals missed by all three sources involves the log-linear model of no second-order interaction, which is quite plausible under the Rasch model. We illustrate the models and their estimation using data from a 1988 dress-rehearsal study for the 1990 census conducted by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, which explored the use of administrative data as a supplement to the PES. The article includes a discussion of extensions and related models.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文