跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确构造观察性研究和随机实验中平均处理效应的置信序列,直接涉及因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ian Waudby-Smith
David Arbour
Ritwik Sinha
Edward H. Kennedy
Aaditya Ramdas

时间一致中心极限定理与渐近置信序列

研究问题
如何将固定样本量下基于中心极限定理的渐近置信区间,扩展为允许持续查看数据和任意停止的时间一致推断?
方法与思路
作者定义渐近置信序列,利用强不变原理对整个样本均值过程作高斯过程近似,并构造平均处理效应的置信序列。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提出渐近置信序列的一般构造方法,并在观察性研究和随机实验中展示其用于序贯因果推断的方式。
阅读关注点
应核对渐近时间一致性的精确定义、强近似条件及处理效应的识别要求,尤其关注停止规则下保障的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 摘要;具体识别和正则条件未说明,渐近时间一致保障不能直接理解为任意有限样本的覆盖保证。

原文摘要

Confidence intervals based on the central limit theorem (CLT) are a cornerstone of classical statistics. Despite being only asymptotically valid, they are ubiquitous because they permit statistical inference under weak assumptions and can often be applied to problems even when nonasymptotic inference is impossible. This paper introduces time-uniform analogues of such asymptotic confidence intervals, adding to the literature on confidence sequences (CS)—sequences of confidence intervals that are uniformly valid over time—which provide valid inference at arbitrary stopping times and incur no penalties for “peeking” at the data, unlike classical confidence intervals which require the sample size to be fixed in advance. Existing CSs in the literature are nonasymptotic, enjoying finite-sample guarantees but not the aforementioned broad applicability of asymptotic confidence intervals. This work provides a definition for “asymptotic CSs” and a general recipe for deriving them. Asymptotic CSs forgo nonasymptotic validity for CLT-like versatility and (asymptotic) time-uniform guarantees. While the CLT approximates the distribution of a sample average by that of a Gaussian for a fixed sample size, we use strong invariance principles (stemming from the seminal 1960s work of Strassen) to uniformly approximate the entire sample average process by an implicit Gaussian process. As an illustration, we derive asymptotic CSs for the average treatment effect in observational studies (for which nonasymptotic bounds are essentially impossible to derive even in the fixed-time regime) as well as randomized experiments, enabling causal inference in sequential environments.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文